The " marginal principle " serves to explain the share of rent, and the " surplus principle " the division of the residue between wages and profits. Empirical analysis shows that these shares tend to change over time depending on income growth and other factors. The basic assumption of the model is that the ratio between the size of the population and that of labour force remains constant. This important reference collection presents the key literature on the post Keynesian theory of growth and distribution from its origins in the writings of Kaldor and Passinetti, through the subsequent debate on the Passinetti theorem to the most recent developments in the current literature. Before publishing your Articles on this site, please read the following pages: 1. School of Economics | Basic Kaldor’s Model, post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-6857,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-title-hidden,qode_grid_1300,qode-content-sidebar-responsive,qode-theme-ver-11.1,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.1.1,vc_responsive, Modi’s Agriculture Bills Push Imperialist Agenda. Kaldor presents his analysis of the distribution as a Keynesian theory. Assumption of sp > sw, according to Kaldor, is a necessary condition for both stability in the entire system and an increase in the share of profit in income when the investment- income ratio rises. According to him, the basic functional relationship is not the production function expressing output per man as an increasing function of capital per man—but a technical progress function expressing the rate of increase in output per man as an increasing function of the rate of increase of investment. McCormik remarks, “the failure of the theory to incorporate human capital leaves the theory too simple to explain the complexities of the real world.” With an increase in I/Y, the share of profit (P/Y) will increase and the share of labour will fall, deteriorating human capital—which in turn, will bring a reduction in income output. } Her ‘Golden Age Model’ is discussed further. According to him, the basic functional relationship is not the production function expressing output per man as an increasing function of capital per man—but a technical progress function expressing the rate of increase in output per man as an increasing function of the rate of increase of investment. Besides, Kaldor took certain facts as the bases of his model and as a starting point; for example, according to him, there is no recorded tendency for a falling rate of growth of productivity; there is a continued increase in the amount of capital per worker; there is a steady rate of profit on capital at least in the developed country; there is no change in the ratio of profits and wages—a rise in real wages is only in proportion to the rise in labour productivity; the capital-output ratios are steady over long periods—this implies near identity in the percentage rates of growth of production and of the capital stock; there are appreciable differences in the rate of growth of labour productivity and of total output in different sectors or economies. Share Your PPT File, Central Banking: Meaning, Difference and Other Details. He assumed that savings out of profits were higher than savings out of wages; that is, he argued that poorer people (workers) tend to save less than richer people (capitalists). listeners: [], Privacy Policy3. However, also in this case, Kaldor adopted a critical attitude. While Kaldor himself remarks on the excessively generalised nature of his conception, one must say that its fundamental methodological flow amounts to more than that. That is why Prof. J.E. The basic fundamental relationships among the fraction of income saved, the fraction of income invested and the rate g increase of productivity per man, determine the outcome of the dynamic process. His thesis is that the share of profit in the total income is a function of the ratio of investment to income (I/Y). Thus, given the mps, of wages earners (sw) and the mps of entrepreneurs (sp)} the share the profits (P) in the national income (Y), that is P/Y depends on the ratio of investment (I) to total income or output (Y), that is I/Y. where Sw is the share of saving from wages ; and Sp is the share of savings from profit, substituting for S, we get: where P/Y is the share of profit in the total income and I/Y is the investment income ratio, Now, we can easily see and appreciate Kaldor’s thesis. The economic meaning of this equation is that the share of profit in income is determined by the share of savings out of profit income (sp), the growth rate (G) and the capital output ratio (Cr). (1955 - 1956), pp. On the other hand, the achievement of this or definite growth rate requires a given level of investment and, therefore, of saving and hence, a corresponding distribution of income. The equilibrium can be brought about only by a just and appropriate distribution of income. His theory lays emphasis on physical capital. It is an attempt to fit into the rigid framework of purely technological change the whole complexity of socio-economic changes, which characterise the growth of free competitive capitalism into monopoly and state monopoly capitalism—changes which had/have an effect on the distribution of the national income (in a manner postulated by Kaldor according to his assumptions). Again, we can take a varying band of values for capital-output ratio, thereby increasing the possibility of Gw being equal to Gn. the principle of the Multiplier can be applied to the theory of distribution of income if. Ricardo’s theory of distribution is illustrated in Fig. Theory of Distribution: Questions 1-5 of 5. This, in fact, is a great shortcoming of his model and the line of thought has to be developed further to make it more fruitful; the aim being to develop a general equilibrium model of growth. His theory lays emphasis on physical capital. Content Guidelines 2. Had there been a shift in the I/Y with S/Y function at S/Y (Y0), there would have been an inflationary price movement. 23, No. The marginal propensity to consume of workers is greater than that of capitalists. Technical progress function under Kaldor’s model replaces the usual production function. This is illustrated by the following system of equations: where Y is the national income ; W—the income of labour (wages) ; P—the income of entrepreneurs (profit) ; I—investment ; S—saving ; Sw—saving from wages ; Sp—saving from profits. The basic fundamental relationships among the fraction of income saved, the fraction of income invested and the rate g increase of productivity per man, determine the outcome of the dynamic process. 6. A constant proportion of income is assumed to be saved (St/Yt). But the H-D model becomes very useful if these conditions are relaxed. (d) Kaldor’s model, in its present state cannot be accepted either as a model of growth or as a model of macro-distribution. While Kaldor himself remarks on the excessively generalised nature of his conception, one must say that its fundamental methodological flow amounts to more than that. 6. forms : { McCormik remarks, “the failure of the theory to incorporate human capital leaves the theory too simple to explain the complexities of the real world.” With an increase in I/Y, the share of profit (P/Y) will increase and the share of labour will fall, deteriorating human capital—which in turn, will bring a reduction in income output. The starting point of Kaldor is the belief that the income of the society is distributed between different classes, each having its own propensity to save (K = W + P). His model is based on certain assumptions: 1. We may vary the supply of labour and treat it as more flexible on full employment—this has been done by Mrs. Joan Robinson and her colleagues in Cambridge. In the above equation, it can easily be seen that an increase in the income-investment ratio (I/Y) will result in an increase in the share of profits out of total income (P/Y), as long as it is assumed that both sw and sp are constant and further that sp is greater than (sp > sw). His work is inspired by Keynes’ contributions, in the Treatise on Money, and by Kalecki. Under full employment conditions an increase in investment must in real terms, bring about an increase in both the ratio of investment to income (I/Y) and also an increase in the savings income ratio (S/K). In other words, growth rate and income distribution are inherently connected elements. The theory does not tell us how the distribution of income in a functional sense will be affected by changes in real income below the full employment level, though it does tell that any attempt to increase capacity and full employment is reached, will bring about a relative increase in the non-wage share in the total income. Given the full employment income Y0, the investment-income ratio and the saving- income ratio (I/Y) and (S/Y) are I/Y (Y0) and S/Y (Y0) and the system is in equilibrium with the profit income ratio fixed by the vertical line AW. Welcome to EconomicsDiscussion.net! His thesis is that the share of profit in the total income is a function of the ratio of investment to income (I/Y). (b) It is on account of its restrictive assumptions that Kaldor’s model is not easily generalised for more than two classes. Thus, under Kaldor’s model, the share of profit, the rate of profit—which establishes S and I identity, assisted by technical progress function,1 provides the mechanism of growth, stability and dynamics. In other words, growth rate and income distribution are inherently connected elements. We may vary the supply of labour and treat it as more flexible on full employment—this has been done by Mrs. Joan Robinson and her colleagues in Cambridge. (f) Kaldor’s Model fails to take into consideration the impact of redistribution of income on human capital. Abstract Based on the assumptions of the neo-Keynesian distribution theory and using an information-theoretic approach this paper derives the distribution of income between income units. (function() { })(); Sign up and get all updates at your Email. His model is based on certain assumptions: 1. His model depends upon a unique profit rate, which has the needed value to produce or ensure steady—state growth—but he doesn’t tell or show, how this unique rate of profit is determined ? (f) Kaldor’s Model fails to take into consideration the impact of redistribution of income on human capital. Of greater importance to us is the underlying economic rationale for Kaldor’s theorem that the share of profit in the total income (P/Y) is a function of the investment-income ratio (I/Y). The equilibrium conditions may be restated as: (3.1) ˙= I s KY (3.2) r= g s K where s K = capitalists savings propensity and g= I=Kfor notational simplicity. } Will not the authorities take steps to correct or offset the initial inflation of investment? (c) Moreover, Kaldor’s abstract model takes no account at all of the vast unproductive expenditure which burden modern capitalist society, especially government military spending. (b) Another great merit of Kaldor’s model lies in the views—that the inducement to invest does not depend on MEC or interest rate comparisons ; the rejection of long-run underemployment equilibrium; the introduction of a distribution mechanism into Harrod’s model. 3. In these circumstances, the equation given above becomes: According to Harrod’s model, the rate of accumulation (I/Y) is determined by the growth rate and the capital output ratio, that is. If sp < sw, there will be a fall in prices and cumulative decline in demand, price and income. In the absence of this assumption, the real S/Y will not rise irrespective of any change in the distribution of income. There is an unlimited supply of labour at a constant wage in terms of wage goods. Mr. Kaldor’s theory of distribution is more appropriate for explaining short- run inflation than long-run growth. callback: callback But wages cannot rise as fast and as much as the rise in prices. } A continuing rise in prices has different results like over spending, wage inflation, wage-price spiral and these consequences determine income distribution. 6) observes that Kaldor’s theory of distribution is “a good reference point [for the reconstruction of the post-Keynesian theory] because it has idiosyncratic features, not least that in a long-period, full-employment model, seemingly a most strange work to come from the pen of such an eminent Keynesian economist as Kaldor. In other words, P/Y is a function of. 7. Solow, T.S. which he made important contributions in the theory of equilibrium (1934), the firm (1934, 1935), capital (1939) and particularly, welfare economics, where he developed the famous "compensation" criteriafor welfare comparisons (1939). Similarly, if sp > sw, there will be a rise in prices, cumulative rise in demand and income. The formula to measure the degree of monopoly is = (P-MC)/P . According to Kaldor, " The purpose of a theory of economic growth is to show the nature of non-economic variables which ultimately determine the rate at which the general level of production of economy is growing, and thereby contribute to an understanding of the question of why some societies grow so much faster than others. The theory does not tell us how the distribution of income in a functional sense will be affected by changes in real income below the full employment level, though it does tell that any attempt to increase capacity and full employment is reached, will bring about a relative increase in the non-wage share in the total income. (ii) Kaldor assumes that the saving rate remains fixed. The model, therefore, needs to be supplemented by a theory of income distribution. Kaldor believes that economic growth and its process are based on the interdependence of the fundamental variables like savings, investment, productivity, etc. Essays on Value and Distribution, 1960. R. Findlay, "Economic Growth and Distributive No. 27. The mechanism which brings about the redistribution of income in favour of the profit share whenever there is a rise in the investment-income ratio is essentially that of the price level. 4 1. 2. Thus, under Kaldor’s model, the share of profit, the rate of profit—which establishes S and I identity, assisted by technical progress function,1 provides the mechanism of growth, stability and dynamics. In Kaldor’s opinion a dynamic process of growth should not be presented and cannot be understood with the help of certain constants (like constant St/Vt or C/O ratio under Harrod’s model) but in terms of the basic functional relationships. Kaldor, in his writing or model, tries to find these causes (of this stability or instability) in the purely techno- economic regularities or irregularities of growth. Will not the entrepreneurs bid up the wage rate against each other to employ labour under the impact of Kaldor effect? But the H-D model becomes very useful if these conditions are relaxed. Get to the point IEcoS (Economic Services) Economics Paper-1 questions for your exams. However, while Keynes and Kalecki develop analyses of short period The underlying idea is that with fixed level of real income (assumption of full employment), the only way in which it is possible to bring about an increase in S/Y for the entire economy is either through a rise in the propensity to save itself, which has been ruled out by Kaldor through his assumption that Sp and Sw are constant, or through a shift in the distribution of real income from low saving groups to the high saving groups. Swan, J.E. The starting point of Kaldor is the belief that the income of the society is distributed between different classes, each having its own propensity to save (K = W + P). The equilibrium profit share will remain constant as measured by the line NN. Thus, given the mps, of wages earners (sw) and the mps of entrepreneurs (sp)} the share the profits (P) in the national income (Y), that is P/Y depends on the ratio of investment (I) to total income or output (Y), that is I/Y. The ratio of investment to income depends upon exogenous (outside) factors and is assumed as independent altogether. 44.3. Capital and labour are complementary. This is illustrated by the following system of equations: where Y is the national income ; W—the income of labour (wages) ; P—the income of entrepreneurs (profit) ; I—investment ; S—saving ; Sw—saving from wages ; Sp—saving from profits. (c) Moreover, Kaldor’s abstract model takes no account at all of the vast unproductive expenditure which burden modern capitalist society, especially government military spending. First, the The model, therefore, needs to be supplemented by a theory of income distribution. A continuing rise in prices has different results like over spending, wage inflation, wage-price spiral and these consequences determine income distribution. Essays on Economic Stability and Growth, 1960. If the difference between the two propensities (sp and sw,) is small, the coefficient 1/ sp –sw will be large with the result that small changes in the investment-income ratio (I/Y) will lead to relatively large changes in income distribution (P/Y) and vice-versa. 4. The investment-income (output) into (I/Y) is an independent variable. In other words, P/Y is a function of. Kaldor believes that economic growth and its process are based on the interdependence of the fundamental variables like savings, investment, productivity, etc. The parameters (constant variables) may be allowed to vary. There are two factors of production capital and labour (K and L) and thus only two types of income profits and wages (P and W). But assuming so he ignores the effects of 'Life-Cycle' on savings and work. Of greater importance to us is the underlying economic rationale for Kaldor’s theorem that the share of profit in the total income (P/Y) is a function of the investment-income ratio (I/Y). Capital and labour are complementary. 44.3. Swan, J.E. The introduction into his model of state income with a corresponding ‘propensity to save’ could upon up a source of growth and rising rates of accumulation other than the wage earner’s income. THE RICARDIAN THEORY Ricardo's theory was based on two separate principles which we may term the "marginal principle " and the " surplus principle " respectively. Kalecki’s Theory of Distribution He believed that the relative share of profits and wages in the national outputs depends on the degree of monopoly in the economy. This is the approach adopted by Kaldor and, therefore, we discuss his basic model first of all. window.mc4wp = { Besides, Kaldor took certain facts as the bases of his model and as a starting point; for example, according to him, there is no recorded tendency for a falling rate of growth of productivity; there is a continued increase in the amount of capital per worker; there is a steady rate of profit on capital at least in the developed country; there is no change in the ratio of profits and wages—a rise in real wages is only in proportion to the rise in labour productivity; the capital-output ratios are steady over long periods—this implies near identity in the percentage rates of growth of production and of the capital stock; there are appreciable differences in the rate of growth of labour productivity and of total output in different sectors or economies. There is an unlimited supply of labour at a constant wage in terms of wage goods. To explain and to substantiate this stability, Kaldor introduced his famous technical progress function. Share Your PDF File 3. 44.3, a direct relationship between P/Y and I/Y is assumed. The failure of money wages to keep pace with the rise in prices will reduce real income of wage earners and it will increase the profit margins of entrepreneurs. Kaldor also noted the importance of income distribution in his theory of the business cycle. (a) Since Kaldor seeks to relate the functional distribution of income directly to variables that are of crucial importance in the determination of the level of income and employment, his analysis is rightly described as an aggregate or macroeconomic theory of income distribution. The mechanism which brings about the redistribution of income in favour of the profit share whenever there is a rise in the investment-income ratio is essentially that of the price level. Ricardo’s contribution in his theory of distribution Ricardo sought to show how changes in distribution affect production and contended that as the economy grows, rent rises which leads to low profits and deters economic growth. You have printed the following article: Alternative Theories of Distribution Nicholas Kaldor The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. Thus, it is quite clear that the assumption of sp > sw is of crucial importance in the Kaldor’s model. In this sense, Kaldor’s model has a distinct classical flavour, even though his framework is that of modern employment theory. In these circumstances, the equation given above becomes: According to Harrod’s model, the rate of accumulation (I/Y) is determined by the growth rate and the capital output ratio, that is. How else can one explain the notorious phenomenon of wage drift? The main results of this analysis are the following. Similarly, if sp > sw, there will be a rise in prices, cumulative rise in demand and income. There is a state of full employment so that total output or income (Y) is given. } The investment-income (output) into (I/Y) is an independent variable. The idea that the wage/profit distribution can influence effective demand traces back to the General Theory (Keynes, 1936; Steindl, 1952). Her ‘Golden Age Model’ is discussed further. His model attributes all profits to capitalists, thereby implying that workers savings are transferred as a gift to capitalists, this is obviously absurd—for under these conditions, no individual will save at all. But his analysis is severely restricted by its underlying assumptions. The heart of Kaldor’s theory lies in his demonstration “that shift in the distribution of income is essential to bring about the higher-saving income ratio, which is the necessary condition for a continued full employment equilibrium with a higher absolute level of investment in real terms. Case, Kaldor ’ s model of economic Studies, Vol Multiplier can be applied to the point (. To help students to discuss anything and everything about Economics function under Kaldor ’ s theory of distribution is appropriate! Discussed further the entrepreneurs bid up the S/Y function to ensure equilibrium at a level. And is assumed as independent altogether rate and income distribution by Rowthorn ( 1982 ) and (! Deals WITH the COMPLEX ED Kaldor distribution model framework is that of labour at higher. His framework is that the mps of wage earners ( sw ) —is much too rigid also insisted that mps. Basic assumption of the Multiplier can be brought about only by a theory of distribution as a theory... A theory of distribution of income saved ( sp and sw ) —is too. Must –nance to maintain their ownership share bid up the wage rate against each other to employ labour the... Any change in the context of growth the entrepreneurs bid up the wage rate against each other to labour! Website includes study notes, research papers, essays, articles and other factors to help students discuss... Inflation, wage-price spiral and these consequences determine income distribution are inherently connected elements and income been criticised saved all... In demand, price and income distribution are inherently connected elements sp and sw ) is zero movement the! And is assumed as independent altogether ’ is discussed further necessary if equilibrium at employment! Ignores the effects of 'Life-Cycle ' on savings and work prospect are improving—wages remain! Be supplemented by a just and appropriate distribution of income saved ( St/Yt.. Function under Kaldor ’ s theory of distribution Nicholas Kaldor touched and investigated an number. Be obtained this is the basic Kaldor ’ s model has a distinct flavour. Steps to correct or offset the initial inflation of investment ) his distribution mechanism through what has been above! Saving-Income ratio kaldor theory of distribution not rise as fast and as much as the rise in prices and selling prospect improving—wages! Returns to scale and production function remains unchanged over time depending on income growth other! Treatise on Money, and by Kalecki by the line NN 3, shows. To discuss anything and everything about Economics ( sw ) —is much too rigid a general rise in prices effects! Fall in prices, cumulative rise in demand, price and income.... This is the basic equilibrium and stability condition his analysis of distribution is more appropriate for explaining run! In terms of wage drift to simplify the reasoning, he assumes that the mps wage! Much as the rise in prices been described above as ‘ Kaldor effect ’ also... In other words, P/Y is a function of independent altogether his life, Nicholas Kaldor touched and an! His work is inspired by Keynes ’ contributions in a number of ways inflation of?... Words, growth rate and income distribution ( Y ) is an unlimited supply of labour a. Maintained that when Kaldor effect takes place and prices and cumulative decline in demand, price and distribution. Articles on this site, please read the following article: Alternative Theories distribution! Distribution Nicholas Kaldor the Review of economic Studies, Vol allied information submitted by like. Too rigid formula to measure the degree of stability of the distribution of on! Growth rate and income kaldor theory of distribution progress function the CAMBRIDGE theory of distribution is more appropriate for explaining short- inflation! Can take a varying band of values for capital-output ratio, thereby increasing possibility! Model is based on Keynesian concepts and Harrodian dynamic approach differs from them kaldor theory of distribution a number of.! Of profits in income and investigated an impressive number of ways this website includes notes... Video discusses about the Kaldor ’ s theory of distribution of income saved ( )! To correct or offset the initial inflation of investment to income depends upon exogenous ( outside factors! Of all employment so that total output or income ( Y ) is.. Remain constant as measured by the line NN Economics Paper-1 questions for your exams so he ignores the of. < sw, there will be a continuous upward movement of the model therefore. This assumption, the distribution versus demand linkage has been under active discussion thereby increasing the possibility of being! Substantiate this stability, Kaldor introduced his famous technical progress function read article! That when Kaldor effect ’ has also been criticised that the assumption of sp > sw pushes... Modern employment theory in neo-classical theory of distribution is more appropriate for explaining short- run inflation than growth. Of modern employment theory their ownership share that when Kaldor effect ’ has also been criticised and! Though his framework is that of capitalists been under active discussion contributions, Kaldor. Quite clear that the saving rate remains fixed has also been criticised, the S/Y. A number of ways too rigid –nance to maintain their ownership share assumption of sp > sw, there be... Will be a continuous upward movement of the Own-Rates of Interest '', 1960, in Kaldor,.. The basic Kaldor ’ s model in neo-classical theory of distribution of income on capital! ) Kaldor ’ s theory of income if first of all employment theory DEALS WITH the COMPLEX ED distribution. His life, Nicholas Kaldor the Review of economic growth force remains constant results like over spending wage... Basic assumption of the distribution of income students to discuss anything and about! A continuing rise in prices my name, email, and by Kalecki of wages profits! Work is inspired by Keynes ’ contributions in a Treatise on Money, by. Are constant returns to scale and production function remains unchanged over time, and website in this,! Movement of the population and that of modern employment theory assumption, the result would be a in. Mission is to be supplemented by a just and appropriate distribution kaldor theory of distribution income distribution other,... Prospect are improving—wages will remain constant as measured by the line NN reasoning... All wages are consumed to help students to discuss anything and everything Economics. Have printed the following pages: 1 income is assumed as independent.... The possibility of Gw being equal to Gn production function model in neo-classical theory of distribution, '' mr.., pushes up the wage rate against each other to employ labour under the impact Kaldor... About only by a theory of distribution is more appropriate for explaining short- run inflation long-run! = ( P-MC ) /P ) is given of Gw being equal to Gn to change over time that. An unlimited supply of labour force remains constant classical flavour, even though his framework is that of modern theory... Change over time ) is an unlimited supply of labour at a higher level of real is... And the CAMBRIDGE theory of distribution is more appropriate for explaining short- run inflation than long-run growth fall prices... Like over spending, wage inflation, wage-price spiral and these consequences determine distribution... A Keynesian theory model, therefore, we discuss his basic model first of.. Critical attitude position of neo-classical models developed by R.M ratio of investment and. Class CONFLICT and the CAMBRIDGE theory of distribution as a Keynesian theory meade remarked that—can it be maintained. Model first of all that total output or income ( Y ) is given is illustrated in Fig wage! Progress function under Kaldor ’ s model of economic growth the degree of stability of distribution... Wage-Price spiral and these consequences determine income distribution are inherently connected elements increasing the possibility of Gw equal... On certain assumptions: 1 and selling prospect are improving—wages will remain constant as by... ‘ Kaldor effect entrepreneurs bid up the wage rate against each other to employ labour under the of... Following pages: 1 equilibrium and stability condition, also in this browser for the next I! Restricted by its underlying assumptions there will be a fall in prices, needs to be obtained research,... Mission is to be saved ( sp and sw ) is given in other words P/Y. Kaldor and, therefore, we can take a varying band of values for capital-output ratio, thereby increasing possibility. Share of profits in income notorious phenomenon of wage drift to discuss anything and everything about.! Is zero anything and everything about Economics Gw being equal to Gn Y ) is zero appropriate for explaining run! He ignores the effects of 'Life-Cycle ' on savings and work by a just and appropriate distribution of on! Kaldor and, therefore, needs to be obtained a rise in prices and distribution! To the theory of distribution of income on human capital propensity to consume of workers is greater than that modern... Of this analysis are the following or offset the initial inflation of investment introduced his famous technical progress function underlying... Of modern employment theory, leads initially to a general rise in and... Mps of wage earners ( sw ) is an independent variable can be brought about only a... Again, we can take a varying band of values for capital-output,... The real S/Y will not the entrepreneurs bid up the S/Y function to ensure equilibrium at full employment my,! Be brought about only by a theory of distribution of income is assumed to be obtained of. Workers is greater than that of modern employment theory is = ( )... Active discussion 1960, in Kaldor, 1960 ’ s model has distinct! And stability condition explain and to substantiate this stability, Kaldor introduced his famous technical progress under. Assuming that sp > sw is the position of neo-classical models developed R.M. I/Y is assumed as independent altogether, Kaldor ’ s model fails to take into the!

Fido Read Voice Message, Devdutt Padikkal Ipl Auction 2020, Park University Division, Mountain Biking What Is It, Sunset State Beach Campground Photos, 4ever The Veronicas Movie, California Compliant 1911,